VAR and Beyond: The Ongoing Struggle for Football Consistency

Assessing the Fallout of the Newcastle - PSG Incident

Updated on
VAR and Beyond: The Ongoing Struggle for Football Consistency
The contentious handball incident during the recent Champions League clash between Newcastle United and Paris Saint-Germain (PSG) has ignited widespread debate and frustration. This occurrence unfolded in injury time, resulting in PSG being granted a penalty after Tino Livramento was deemed to have handled the ball within the penalty area. The subsequent decision, which led to Kylian Mbappé converting the penalty and culminating in a 1-1 draw, has attracted considerable criticism and censure.
Prominent figures like former Newcastle captain Alan Shearer, alongside television pundits Ally McCoist and Jermaine Jenas, have vehemently disapproved of the decision. Shearer expressed his dissatisfaction on Twitter, while McCoist and Jenas characterized the ruling as a "disgrace" and "shocking," respectively. They underscored that the ball initially struck Livramento's chest before making contact with his arm, triggering widespread outrage and a prevailing sentiment of having been "cheated" among fans and pundits.
Kylian Mbappe
The controversy has brought attention to the disparities in handball regulations between UEFA and the Premier League. Observers have pointed out that the penalty awarded in the Newcastle-PSG encounter might not have been sanctioned in the Premier League, underscoring the more stringent handball rules in UEFA competitions. This has prompted calls for transparent and uniform application of handball regulations across diverse football leagues and tournaments.
The aftermath of this contentious decision has left Newcastle United and their supporters feeling aggrieved, given the potential ramifications on their Champions League knockout qualification. The incident has rekindled the ongoing discourse surrounding VAR and its influence on match outcomes, with many advocating for a reassessment of the system and its impact on the game's integrity.
The 2023/24 football season has been marked by a series of controversies surrounding the implementation of Video Assistant Referee (VAR) technology across European leagues and competitions. From the Premier League to the Bundesliga and the UEFA Champions League, VAR has triggered debates on its efficacy and consistency, with numerous instances where VAR decisions have significantly altered match outcomes.
Referee pointing for a penalty
While VAR technology was introduced to mitigate controversy and enhance decision-making in football, it appears to have had the opposite effect. The primary issue seems to be the inconsistent application of VAR and the subjective interpretation of incidents by referees. The controversies surrounding VAR have prompted calls for revisions in how the technology is employed. Some propose that the problem lies not with VAR itself but with the referees utilizing it, advocating for accountability and consequences for mistakes.
Others posit that AI could replace human decision-making in VAR, eliminating subjective bias and ensuring consistent decisions across all matches. However, any alterations to VAR must be meticulously considered to avoid disrupting the flow of the game or triggering further controversies. The integration of technology into football is still a relatively new development, requiring time to strike the right balance between human judgment and technological assistance.
One critical issue with VAR is the subjective nature of interpretations, leading to debates among referees and resulting in inconsistent decisions. The exchange of information between VAR and on-pitch referees is often suboptimal, causing confusion and erroneous decisions. For instance, in a Tottenham match, VAR Darren England mistakenly disallowed a goal he thought he was confirming. Inadequate communication can also contribute to confusion and frustration among spectators, as seen in a match between Liverpool and Tottenham, where major decisions underwent prolonged reviews without explanations to the fans.
Referee reviewing VAR footage
Football leagues and organizations have proactively addressed errors associated with the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) system. Responses typically involve acknowledging errors, implementing corrective measures, and striving to enhance the system. Transparency has been a key aspect of addressing VAR errors. For instance, the Professional Game Match Officials Limited (PGMOL), the referees' body in England, admitted to a VAR error that denied Liverpool a legitimate goal against Tottenham Hotspur. They released the full audio from the VAR center related to the mistake, attributing it to human error and miscommunication.
In the wake of VAR errors, football organizations have taken steps to prevent similar mistakes in the future. Following the error in the Liverpool-Tottenham match, PGMOL introduced a new protocol to ensure clear communication between the referee and the VAR team. The VAR officials involved in the error were also replaced for subsequent games.

Is there an answer to all of this VAR controversy? Let us know your solution below!

Published on Updated on

Leave a comment